Bypass Surgery More Cost Effective Than Stents for Diabetics Long Term

Bypass Surgery More Cost Effective Than Stents for Diabetics Long Term

American Heart Association Late-Breaking Clinical Trial Report - 6:12 p.m.
PT/9:12 p.m. ET

Study Highlights:

  *Bypass surgery is more cost effective than drug-covered stents for people
    with diabetes who have multiple clogged heart arteries.
  *Initially, bypass surgery may cost more than implanting stents, but
    because in the long-term it resulted in fewer deaths and heart attacks,
    it's worth the front-end expense, researchers said.

LOS ANGELES, Nov. 4, 2012 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bypass surgery may be more
expensive than drug-coated stents, but in the long run it's more cost
effective for patients with diabetes because of superior long-term clinical
outcomes, according to late-breaking clinical trial research presented at the
American Heart Association's Scientific Sessions 2012.

In a sub-study of the FREEDOM trial, researchers analyzed economic data from
1,900 participants that compared bypass surgery to drug-coated stents to prop
open clogged arteries in patients with diabetes who had more than one blocked
artery. The study included patients from 16 countries, including 19 percent
from the United States.

Initially, bypass surgery cost $8,622 more because patients were hospitalized
longer and had more complications soon after. But, in the five years after the
procedures, follow-up costs were significantly higher in patients treated with
drug-coated stents. Even after factoring those costs, bypass surgery still
costs about $3,600 more.

However, patients who received bypass surgery had a lower risk of dying or
having a heart attack.

Researchers reported their cost-effectiveness results in terms of cost per
"quality-adjusted life-year (QALY)," gained, which considers both the
difference in how long patients can be expected to live after bypass surgery
or stenting, as well as their quality of life.

Bypass surgery was found to have a lifetime cost-effectiveness of $8,132 per
QALY gained. That's far below the commonly used benchmark of $50,000/QALY
gained for considering a treatment to be cost effective.

"Our results demonstrate that bypass surgery is not only beneficial from a
clinical standpoint, but also economically attractive from the perspective of
the U.S. healthcare system," said Elizabeth A. Magnuson, Sc.D., lead
investigator of the study and director of health economics and technology
assessment at Saint Luke's Mid-America Heart Institute in Kansas City, Mo.
"The economic data are important because of the large number of people with
diabetes who are in need of procedures to unblock clogged arteries."

The results support the American Heart Association guidelines already in place
since the mid-1990s that have recommended bypass surgery for patients with
diabetes who have multiple blocked arteries in the heart, she said.

"With great concerns about escalating healthcare costs, it's very important
when setting policy to understand the benefits gained from additional
expenditures over the long run," said Magnuson, who is also professor of
medicine at the University of Missouri's Kansas City School of Medicine. "This
is especially true in cardiovascular disease where many interventions tend to
be very costly up front."

Longer follow-up of the patients will be needed to see if the advantages of
bypass continue in the years following the initial five years of the study.

Co-authors are Valentin Fuster, M.D, Ph.D.; Michael E. Farkouh, M.D., M.Sc.;
Kaijun Wang, Ph.D.; Katharine Vilain, M.P.H.; Haiyan Li, M.S.; Jaime
Appelwick, B.A.; Victoria Muratov, M.D. M.P.H.; Lynn A. Sleeper, Sc.D.; Mouin
Abdallah, M.D.; and David J. Cohen, M.D., M.Sc.

Disclosures are here

The National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute funded the study. Cordis, Johnson
and Johnson and Boston Scientific provided stents. Eli Lilly provided
abciximab and an unrestricted research grant and Sanofi-Aventis and Bristol
Myers Squibb provided clopidogrel.

Follow news from the American Heart Association's Scientific Sessions 2012 via
Twitter: @HeartNews.


Statements and conclusions of study authors that are presented at American
Heart Association scientific meetings are solely those of the study authors
and do not necessarily reflect association policy or position. The
association makes no representation or warranty as to their accuracy or
reliability. The association receives funding primarily from individuals;
foundations and corporations (including pharmaceutical, device manufacturers
and other companies) also make donations and fund specific association
programs and events. The association has strict policies to prevent these
relationships from influencing the science content. Revenues from
pharmaceutical and device corporations are available at

Note: The FREEDOM cost effectiveness sub-study presentation is 6:12 p.m. PT,
Sunday, Nov. 4, in Hall G.

For Media Inquiries:

AHA News Media in Dallas: (214) 706-1396

AHA News Media Office, Nov. 3-7

at the Los Angeles Convention Center: (213) 743-6205

For Public Inquiries: (800) AHA-USA1 (242-8721) and

American Heart Association Logo
Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.