No on Prop. 37: IN CASE YOU MISSED IT - U-T San Diego writes second No on 37 editorial, calls it a "scam" because of enforcement

 No on Prop. 37: IN CASE YOU MISSED IT - U-T San Diego writes second No on 37
   editorial, calls it a "scam" because of enforcement provisions allowing
                             shakedown lawsuits.

Chico Enterprise Record and Investor's Business Daily also go No on 37. In
total, 40 newspapers from throughout the state -- NO on 37.

PR Newswire

SACRAMENTO, Calif., Oct. 24, 2012

SACRAMENTO, Calif., Oct. 24, 2012 /PRNewswire/ --The U-T San Diego today
editorialized a second time against Prop. 37, calling it a "scam" and saying
it "keeps looking worse." The editorial warned voters about the potential for
shakedown lawsuits allowed by the measure.

Also in recent editorials, Investor's Business Daily and the Chico
Enterprise-Record urged their readers to vote NO on Proposition 37. That makes
40 daily newspapers urging NO.

Read all No on Prop. 37 editorials here.

Read the U-T San Diego, Chico Enterprise-Record and Investor's Business Daily
editorials.

U-T San Diego, Prop. 37 Keeps Looking Worse, 10/24/2012

  o"Trial lawyers drafted it in a way that allows shakedown lawsuits
    targeting anyone in food sales without even having to establish that any
    damage occurred..."
  o"What a scam."

Chico Enterprise-Record, Editorial: Proposition 37 unneeded, unfair,
10/23/2012

  o"California is the highest-producing agricultural state in the nation. We
    shouldn't slap unnecessary regulations on a successful industry."
  o"If Proposition 37 and its confusing language are adopted…individuals can
    sue for violations, and you can bet that attorneys will turn these
    lawsuits into a profit center…"
  o"…good for lawyers but bad for farmers."
  o"Farmers don't need more regulations and unnecessary labels."
  o"…vote no on 37."

Investor's Business Daily, Prop 37 Will Cost Californians At The Grocery
Store, 10/19/2012

  o"Voters need to stop this foolishness."
  o"…backers… promise it "won't cost you a dime," but that's simply not
    true."
  o"Prop. 37 supporters argue that the labeling is a health issue. It's not."
  o"We're not aware of a single credible study that says GMO foods are less
    safe than non-GMO foods."
  o"… very bad regulation."

Newspapers Endorsing No on Prop. 37:

  oLos Angeles Times
  oLa Opinion
  oSan Francisco Chronicle
  oSacramento Bee
  oLA Daily News
  oSan Jose Mercury News
  oU-T San Diego
  oOakland Tribune
  oContra Costa Times
  oOrange County Register
  oSanta Rosa Press Democrat
  oRiverside Press Enterprise
  oLong Beach Press Telegram
  oTorrance Daily Breeze
  oSan Gabriel Valley Tribune
  oPasadena Star News
  oWhittier Daily News
  oSan Bernardino Sun
  oInland Valley Daily Bulletin
  oFresno Bee
  oSanta Cruz Sentinel
  oMerced Sun-Star
  oModesto Bee
  oRedding Record Searchlight
  oWoodland Daily Democrat
  oBakersfield Californian
  oChico Enterprise-Record
  oInvestor's Business Daily
  oVentura County Star
  oCarmel Pine Cone
  oEast County Times
  oWest County Times
  oSan Ramon Valley Times
  oTri Valley Times
  oFremont Argus
  oHayward Daily Review
  oPalm Springs Desert Sun
  oVictorville Daily Press

About Prop. 37

Proposition 37 would ban the sale of tens of thousands of perfectly-safe,
common grocery products only in California unless they are specially
repackaged, relabeled or remade with higher cost ingredients. Prop. 37 is not
a simple labeling measure. It will increase grocery bills for California
families by up to $400 a year, add more government bureaucracy and taxpayer
costs, will create a new way for trial lawyers to file shakedown lawsuits, and
includes loopholes and exemptions which make no sense. All of this without
providing any health or safety benefits. That's why Prop. 37 is opposed by a
broad coalition of family farmers, scientists, doctors, business, labor,
taxpayers and consumers.

Paid for by No on 37: Coalition Against the Deceptive Food Labeling Scheme,
sponsored by Farmers, Food Producers, and Grocers. Major funding by Monsanto
Company, E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA)
and more than 40 food company members. For a full list of donors visit
www.NoProp37.com/donors. ● 1-800-331-0850 ● www.NoProp37.com

SOURCE No on Prop. 37

Website: http://www.noprop37.com
Contact: Kathy Fairbanks, 1-800-331-0850, press@noprop37.com
 
Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.