Bell shocked by CRTC rejection of Astral transaction, requests Cabinet
-- Bell will ask federal Cabinet to issue direction to CRTC to
follow its own regulatory policy
-- Decision a breach of the CRTC's Diversity of Voices policy, and
protects cable conglomerates and rewards their extraordinary
and obstructive lobbying efforts
-- CRTC decision denies Canadians hundreds of millions in new
content funding, innovative new broadcast services, enhanced
programming choice and competition
MONTREAL, Oct. 18, 2012 /CNW Telbec/ - BCE Inc. (Bell) today announced it will
request that the federal Cabinet intervene in the CRTC's decision to reject
Bell's acquisition of Astral Media. Bell is appalled that the CRTC would come
to a decision that so negatively impacts Canadian consumers and the national
broadcast industry, contravenes its own policy and is tainted by
behind-the-scenes lobbying by Bell's cable rivals.
"This is a decision that should not stand. Canadian consumers were told today
by the CRTC that they don't deserve more - more choice, more competition, more
Canadian content funding - all of which Bell and Astral committed to with this
transaction," said George Cope, President and CEO of Bell Canada and BCE Inc.
"We met all the CRTC's rules, indeed our acquisition of Astral was based
directly on the CRTC's currently in-place Diversity of Voices policy. The
wide-ranging benefits to Canadians of the transaction are clear, but the CRTC
has told consumers that they and the rules in place just don't matter."
In its 2008 Diversity of Voices regulatory policy, the CRTC confirmed that it
would approve broadcasting transactions resulting in a company controlling
less than 35% of total TV audience share. Bell and Astral combined would have
an English-language TV market share of 33.5% and just 24.4% of the
French-language TV market, both well within the rules (it is worth noting that
this would put Bell-Astral on par with cable company Shaw/Corus, which has a
30.2% share of English-language TV, and well behind cable company Quebecor's
existing 30% share of French-language TV).
With this CRTC policy in place, and which Bell logically used as its guide in
acquiring Astral, the CRTC instead quotes a working paper from 1978, a single
application from 1986 and a 1989 public notice to justify its rejection of the
Bell-Astral transaction in 2012.
"The CRTC's decision reflects a bygone era, based on antiquated working papers
from the 1970s and 1980s that have little bearing on modern Canadian
broadcasting, and completely ignores its own most recent policy. Canadian
broadcasting needs significant new investment, fresh ideas and increased
choice in a time of cable company dominance in media and accelerating
competition from foreign giants who invest little to nothing in the Canadian
broadcasting system," said Mirko Bibic, Bell's Chief Legal and Regulatory
Officer. "Considering the dire impact the CRTC's decision will have on
consumers in communities small and large, the blow it delivers to confidence
in Canada's regulatory system, and the fact that the CRTC worked so closely
with cable companies to arrive at its conclusions, Bell is compelled to launch
its request to the federal Cabinet to direct the CRTC to actually follow its
own in-place policy."
Bell has confirmed that senior CRTC officials met privately with Bell's cable
competitors multiple times in the days and weeks before the commission began
its public hearings into the Bell-Astral transaction, while denying Bell the
opportunity for any such consultations - calling into question the
impartiality of the entire process.
"That the CRTC was not guided by its own rules is a grave concern. In fact,
this is just the latest in a series of decisions where the commission held
hearings, established rules… and then inexplicably ignored them when Bell
moved forward with a strategic investment. This sends a strong message that
Canadian broadcasting regulation is impetuous and unreliable, " said Kevin
Crull, President of Bell Media.
Bell's acquisition of Astral was supported by independent producers,
advertisers, media companies, community and arts groups - and by 99.84% of
Astral shareholders. In rejecting the transaction, the CRTC sent a clear
message to the broadcasting industry, investors and the corporate sector that
its own rules don't matter - to the detriment of consumers across Canada.
"A combined Bell-Astral would grow the entire Canadian broadcasting industry
to the benefit of consumers and content creators. Instead, the CRTC has
decided to favour the interests of unregulated U.S. broadcast channels and
Internet television providers, while blatantly protecting the interests of
cable companies, such as Québecor, which continues to dominate the
French-language media market" said Mr. Crull.
If the CRTC's decision is allowed to stand, the Astral-Bell transaction will
not be allowed to close and the negative outcomes are clear:
-- It cuts off more than $240 million in new funding for Canadian
content, including greatly expanded Canadian news and
entertainment programming in both official languages.
-- French-language consumers have been robbed of a planned
national French-language news service based in Québec; Québec
consumers, content creators and its broadcasting industry
remain at the mercy of Québecor, the integrated
cable-broadcaster that has long dominated Québec media with a
French-language TV market share of 30%, far higher than the
combined Bell-Astral share of 24.4%.
-- Consumers across the country are denied a stronger homegrown
voice able to compete with unregulated U.S. TV channels and
Internet OTT broadcasters - including with Bell's planned
all-Canadian service featuring Astral's Canadian and
international movies and Bell Media news, sports and
entertainment programming to compete with cross-border services
like Netflix and Apple TV.
-- It forces a review of Bell's commitment to continue to operate
money-losing TV stations in small communities across Canada as
part of the Bell-Astral investment plan.
-- Canadians in the North are denied significant new broadband
communications infrastructure planned as part of the
Bell-Astral benefits package.
Rather than welcome these clear benefits to consumers of the Bell-Astral plan
to invest heavily in Canadian programming and broadcasting services, the CRTC
chose instead to serve cable companies focused on protecting their profit
margins, already the highest in North America. These same corporations
dedicated their vast TV, print and other media holdings to an aggressive and
blatantly misleading campaign aimed at subverting due process and quashing
enhanced competition. In combination with private meetings with the cablecos,
the CRTC fell head over heels for their carefully orchestrated and well-funded
propaganda effort that made a mockery of the entire process.
If the CRTC's decision stands, one of the closing conditions for Bell's $3.38
billion acquisition of Astral Media will not be met and the transaction will
not proceed. The transaction also remains subject to approval by the federal
Headquartered in Montréal since its founding in 1880, Bell is Canada's
largest communications company, providing consumers and business with
solutions to all their communications needs. Bell Media is Canada's premier
multimedia company with leading assets in television, radio and digital media.
Bell is wholly owned by Montréal's BCE Inc. (TSX, NYSE: BCE). For Bell
product and service information, please visit Bell.ca. For Bell Media, please
visit BellMedia.ca. For BCE corporate information, please visit BCE.ca.
The Bell Mental Health Initiative is a multi-year charitable program that
promotes mental health across Canada via the Bell Let's Talk anti-stigma
campaign and support for community care, research and workplace best
practices. To learn more, please visit Bell.ca/LetsTalk.
Caution Concerning Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements made in this news release, including, but not limited to,
statements relating to the proposed acquisition by BCE Inc. of Astral Media
Inc. and other statements that are not historical facts, are forward-looking.
Forward-looking statements, by their very nature, are subject to inherent
risks, uncertainties and assumptions which give rise to the possibility that
actual results or events could differ materially from our expectations
expressed in or implied by such forward-looking statements. As a result, we
cannot guarantee that any forward-looking statement will materialize and you
are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.
The forward-looking statements contained in this news release describe our
expectations at the date of this news release and, accordingly, are subject to
change after such date. Except as may be required by Canadian securities laws,
we do not undertake any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking
statements contained in this news release, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise. Forward-looking statements are
provided herein for the purpose of giving information about the proposed
transaction referred to above. Readers are cautioned that such information may
not be appropriate for other purposes. For additional information with respect
to certain of these and other assumptions and risks, please refer to BCE
Inc.'s 2012 First Quarter MD&A dated May 2, 2012, filed by BCE Inc. with the
Canadian securities commissions (available at www.sedar.com) and with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission (available at www.sec.gov). This document
is also available on BCE Inc.'s website at www.bce.ca.
Marie-Eve Francoeur Bell Media Relations (514)391-5263
Thane Fotopoulos BCE Investor Relations (514) 870-4619 email@example.com
SOURCE: BELL CANADA
To view this news release in HTML formatting, please use the following URL:
CO: BELL CANADA
NI: TLS TVNEWS INTERNET ENT MNA
-0- Oct/18/2012 23:13 GMT
Press spacebar to pause and continue. Press esc to stop.