No on Prop. 37: IN CASE YOU MISSED IT - San Jose Mercury News and Santa Cruz Sentinel Urge No on Prop. 37

 No on Prop. 37: IN CASE YOU MISSED IT - San Jose Mercury News and Santa Cruz
                         Sentinel Urge No on Prop. 37

34 daily newspapers from around the state agree Prop. 37 should be opposed.

PR Newswire

SACRAMENTO, Calif., Oct. 8, 2012

SACRAMENTO, Calif., Oct. 8, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- In editorials this weekend,
the San Jose Mercury News and Santa Cruz Sentinel both urged voters to reject
Proposition 37 on the November ballot. The overwhelming majority of daily
newspapers from across California have opposed Prop. 37. Read all No on Prop.
37 editorials here.

Read the complete editorials in the San Jose Mercury News and Santa Cruz
Sentinel.

San Jose Mercury News, Prop 37 has best of intent, bad drafting, 10/7/12

  o"Proposition 37 should never have been placed on the ballot this fall."
  o"...there are real problems with this particular law."
  o"A badly drafted law with good intentions is still a bad law."
  o"Voters should reject Prop. 37."

Santa Cruz Sentinel, Editorial: No on 37: Flawed measure could prove costly
and add to litigation burden, 10/7/12

  o"Clearly, this provision would create even more lawsuits.And who would
    this benefit? Lawyers."
  o"...this sloppily written measure is not the answer."
  o"...Prop. 37 could add to food costs for consumers, hurt small businesses
    and create yet another avenue for costly litigation."
  o"Vote no on Proposition 37."

Newspapers Endorsing No on Prop. 37:

  oLos Angeles Times
  oSan Francisco Chronicle
  oSacramento Bee
  oLA Daily News
  oSan Jose Mercury News
  oU-T San Diego
  oOakland Tribune
  oContra Costa Times
  oOrange County Register
  oSanta Rosa Press Democrat
  oRiverside Press Enterprise
  oLong Beach Press Telegram
  oTorrance Daily Breeze
  oSan Gabriel Valley Tribune
  oPasadena Star News
  oWhittier Daily News
  oSan Bernardino Sun
  oInland Valley Daily Bulletin
  oFresno Bee
  oSanta Cruz Sentinel
  oMerced Sun-Star
  oModesto Bee
  oRedding Record Searchlight
  oWoodland Daily Democrat
  oBakersfield Californian
  oVentura County Star
  oCarmel Pine Cone
  oEast County Times
  oWest County Times
  oSan Ramon Valley Times
  oTri Valley Times
  oFremont Argus
  oHayward Daily Review
  oPalm Springs Desert Sun
  oVictorville Daily Press

About Prop. 37
Proposition 37 would ban the sale of tens of thousands of perfectly-safe,
common grocery products only in California unless they are specially
repackaged, relabeled or made with higher cost ingredients. Prop 37 is a
deceptive, deeply flawed food labeling scheme that would add more government
bureaucracy and taxpayer costs, create new frivolous lawsuits, and increase
food costs by billions — without providing any health or safety benefits.
That's why Prop 37 is opposed by a broad coalition of family farmers,
scientists, doctors, business, labor, taxpayers and consumers.

Paid for by No on 37: Coalition Against the Deceptive Food Labeling Scheme,
sponsored by Farmers, Food Producers, and Grocers. Major funding by Monsanto
Company, E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA)
and more than 40 food company members. For a full list of donors visit
www.NoProp37.com/donors.- 1-800-331-0850 - www.NoProp37.com

SOURCE No on Prop. 37

Website: http://www.noprop37.com
Contact: Kathy Fairbanks, 1-800-331-0850, press@noprop37.com