Obama’s Plan to Close Guantanamo Forces Decision About Inmates
By James Rowley
Dec. 3 (Bloomberg) -- Barack Obama’s promise to close the
Guantanamo Bay prison camp for suspected terrorists will force
the new president to decide what to do with inmates who can’t be
tried for war crimes yet are deemed too dangerous to be released.
About 250 detainees remain at the prison camp opened on a
U.S. Navy base in Cuba after the Sept. 11 attacks. More than 520
others have been repatriated or sent to another country. Obama
said Nov. 16 on CBS he will close the prison as part of an
effort, including a ban on torture during interrogations, “to
regain America’s moral stature in the world.”
Logistically, Obama may be able to “close Guantanamo pretty
quickly” once he finds facilities on the mainland to house the
prisoners, said Matthew Waxman, a former Defense Department
official who teaches law at Columbia University. “The bigger
issue is on what legal basis are you going to hold them?”
More than 100 inmates can’t be put on trial because of a
lack of evidence and the Bush administration considers them too
dangerous to release. Legal experts suggest several options, such
as keeping them under the Bush administration designation of
“unlawful enemy combatant,” labeling them prisoners of war or
asking Congress to create a new type of preventive or
administrative detention.
Obama has called for trying detainees in civilian or regular
military courts instead of the military war-crimes tribunal
created in 2006. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the self-proclaimed
mastermind of al-Qaeda’s Sept. 11 attacks, and four co-defendants
are scheduled to appear before a tribunal next week, possibly
their last hearing if Obama quickly abolishes or replaces the
war-crimes courts.
Defense Secretary
Defense Secretary Robert Gates, who will remain in Obama’s
administration, said at a news conference yesterday that closing
Guantanamo should be a “high priority” and that new legislation
will be needed to keep released detainees from seeking asylum in
the U.S. In May, Gates said the U.S. was “stuck” with
Guantanamo because some inmates couldn’t be charged or released.
Adjusting the legal status of the Guantanamo detainees means
“you are not just going to close the base and give everyone an
airline ticket,” said Senator Christopher Dodd, a Connecticut
Democrat who has supported expanding due-process rights of
Guantanamo inmates.
Closing Guantanamo won’t “happen as quickly as people would
like. It’s such a Gordian knot,” said Democratic Representative
Adam Schiff of California, a former prosecutor who has pushed for
changes in detainee policy.
Obama’s first step should be to announce a plan to close
Guantanamo, then review all detainee files to determine which
ones can be prosecuted, said Jennifer Daskal, counterterrorism
counsel for Human Rights Watch.
Coerced Evidence
That will depend on whether the evidence meets the higher
standards of proof required in those courts, including a ban on
evidence obtained by coercion, experts say.
Such legal determinations may complicate the prosecution of
such “high value” detainees as Mohammed, who has alleged during
courtroom appearances that he was tortured in CIA custody.
The CIA said he was one of three inmates subjected to
waterboarding, an interrogation technique that simulates
drowning. If his statements on the Sept. 11 attacks are barred
from use in court, Mohammed still could be taken to trial on 1996
criminal charges of conspiring to blow up U.S. airliners en route
to the Far East.
In addition to the Sept. 11 defendants, 12 other people
await trials before the military tribunals. The Pentagon is
preparing to bring war-crimes charges against as many as 80
detainees altogether.
The new administration then should “move quickly to
repatriate or resettle others,” Daskal said.
Resettlement
Resettlement won’t be easy. The Pentagon has determined that
at least 60 Guantanamo detainees are releasable if the U.S. can
persuade other countries to accept them.
In the last seven months, almost 20 have been released. The
latest is Salim Hamdan, a former bodyguard and driver for al-
Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden. Hamdan, convicted of providing
material support for terrorism, was sent from Guantanamo to Yemen
in November to serve the final month of his 5 1/2-year sentence.
More than 100 inmates are classified as not releasable
because they can’t be put on trial and they also pose a threat to
national security.
“There are some real concerns” these detainees “will join
the fight against us” or will be tortured if returned to their
homeland, Schiff said.
“Clearly some are more of a threat than others” and the
Obama administration may have a different view on whether
releasing a particular detainee would endanger U.S. security,
said Anthony Clark Arend, a government and foreign service
professor at Georgetown University.
Enemy Combatants
The new administration may decide to continue to hold this
group as enemy combatants subject to periodic administrative
review, though Obama criticized the procedure in 2006.
Federal judges in Washington are considering about 200
Guantanamo inmates’ challenges to their detention, and the
Supreme Court has signaled there may be a limit on indefinite
detention. One judge last month ordered the release of five
inmates on grounds the government didn’t prove they were enemy
combatants.
Obama could also ask Congress to create a new legal status
called preventive or administrative detention. Waxman said that
would be “politically controversial” and trigger a debate about
“the dangers to our legal system and legal principles that flow
from institutionalizing a system of detention without trial.”
Alternatively, the Obama administration could declare these
detainees to be prisoners of war, which would remove them from
the jurisdiction of federal courts.
Geneva Conventions
Under the Geneva Conventions, prisoners of war must be
released once hostilities end. President George W. Bush declared
that al-Qaeda terrorists weren’t traditional POWs -- soldiers who
could be relied upon not to attack the U.S. once their country
ceases the hostilities of war.
“The real challenge when you are dealing with non-state
actors and terrorists in a so-called war on terror” is that they
“want to continue to challenge you,” Arend said.
For inmates awaiting trials before the military tribunals, a
fresh review of their cases by new political leadership at the
Pentagon may enable some to be tried in federal courts or under
military court-martial, said Schiff, a former prosecutor.
The Obama administration “may well face extremely
difficult, shattering choices” of dropping some cases because
the evidence doesn’t meet higher standards of proof, said Eugene
Fidell, who teaches military law at Yale Law School in New Haven,
Connecticut, and is president of the National Institute of
Military Justice.
The new administration “may have to allow one or two people
to escape justice in order to accomplish a larger goal” of
restoring confidence in U.S. rule of law, Fidell said.
Dodd acknowledged the difficulties the new administration
faces in closing the prison camp. Still, he said, “the most
important point is closing the place” because “that message is
the one that is going to resonate.”
To contact the reporter on this story:
James Rowley at
jarowley@bloomberg.net
Last Updated: December 3, 2008 00:01 EST