FEC, Overruling Counsel, Declines to Fine Chamber-Funded Group
By Jonathan D. Salant
Dec. 29 (Bloomberg) -- The Federal Election Commission, in a
party-line vote, has overruled a recommendation by its counsel to
fine a U.S. Chamber of Commerce group accused of illegal spending
practices in attacking the Democratic vice presidential nominee
in 2004.
The Republican members of the FEC opposed the penalty
against the chamber’s November Fund, creating a 3-3 deadlock that
rejected the counsel’s recommendation.
The November Fund was accused of violating federal campaign
spending limits by using $3 million it received from the chamber
to attack Democratic vice presidential nominee John Edwards, a
former trial lawyer, in 2004. The FEC deadlock in the November
Fund case was announced last week.
“The FEC has transformed itself from a merely dysfunctional
agency to one that now openly thumbs its nose at the law,” said
Paul Ryan of the Campaign Legal Center, a Washington-based
watchdog group headed by former FEC Chairman Trevor Potter.
FEC Chairman Donald McGann, one of the three Republicans to
oppose penalties against the November Fund, had no immediate
comment. None of the three Republicans have publicly explained
their votes.
The FEC party-line vote to reverse its counsel’s
recommendation is highly unusual. The commission has three
Democrats and three Republicans, with four votes needed for any
enforcement action.
There were 12 instances in which groups like the November
Fund -- so-called 527s named for a section of the tax code --
were accused of violating campaign finance rules in the 2004
presidential race. Only the November Fund avoided any fine. The
potential size of the penalty wasn’t revealed by the FEC.
Open Criticism
Two of the three Democratic FEC commissioners, Cynthia
Bauerly and Ellen Weintraub, issued a rare public criticism of
the decision not to penalize the November Fund. They said the
action is a “dramatic departure” from “the commission’s prior
enforcement efforts and the law itself.”
The November Fund marked the chamber’s first foray into
presidential politics. Some of the best-known independent groups
in the 2004 presidential election, including Swift Boat Veterans
for Truth and America Coming Together, paid more than $3 million
in fines.
The commission initially agreed in March 2005 that the
November Fund illegally accepted contributions in excess of the
$5,000 limit for political action committees and that the chamber
made illegal corporate contributions. In November 2007, the
commission authorized its counsel to negotiate a settlement,
including an agreed-upon fine.
New Members
Four new members joined the commission the following year,
and in October 2008 the three Republicans balked at approving the
final agreement.
“The law has not changed,” Ryan said. “All that has
changed is the commissioners themselves.”
“It is a pretty stark reversal of the commission’s
interpretation of the law,” said Melanie Sloan, executive
director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington,
a watchdog group that filed the complaint with the FEC. “The 3-3
vote on this enforcement matter may indicate that the newly
reconstituted commission is ideologically split along partisan
lines.”
Under the election law, CREW can appeal the FEC’s decision
in U.S. District Court.
Chamber spokesman J.P. Fielder applauded the FEC’s action.
“We’re very pleased with this decision,” Fielder said.
“We’re looking forward to having the matter behind us.”
The 527 groups weren’t as active this year. Spending dipped
to $216 million from $442 million in 2004, according to the
Center for Responsive Politics, a Washington-based research
group.
While this year’s Democratic vice-presidential nominee, Joe
Biden, was a strong supporter of trial lawyers and opposed
efforts to limit lawsuits, the November Fund was inactive and the
chamber stayed out of the presidential race.
To contact the reporter on this story:
Jonathan D. Salant in Washington at
jsalant@bloomberg.net
.
Last Updated: December 29, 2008 14:52 EST