Bush's Hands-Off Management Style Contributes to Political Woes
By Edwin Chen and Holly Rosenkrantz
March 19 (Bloomberg) -- President George W. Bush's insular
management system, which values loyalty and old Texas ties while
discouraging dissent, may be at the root of the political
misfortunes undermining his presidency.
Bush -- once hailed as an ``MBA president'' skilled in the
art of delegating -- has delegated to the point of detachment,
some political scientists and presidential management experts
say. His isolation and reliance on unquestioning loyalists have
contributed to the image of a president who's out of the loop on
vital decisions.
``The problem isn't the staff,'' said Norman Ornstein, a
scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, a Washington-based
policy research organization. ``It lies with the president.''
Ornstein recalled a weeklong cruise he took with Bush in
1990, during which they discussed management issues. Bush, he
said, talked about his preference for delegating duties to
subordinates and holding them accountable. Since then, Ornstein
has concluded that ``the lessons he learned, at the Harvard
Business School and as head of an oil company, he has not
followed through on.''
The second-term housecleaning that installed budget director
Josh Bolten as chief of staff and saw the return to full-time
duties of strategist Karl Rove has failed to reinvigorate the
White House. The administration has been rocked by political
setbacks, most recently the flap over the roles of Attorney
General Alberto Gonzales and Rove in the firing of eight U.S.
attorneys.
Implosion
That flap followed the implosion of Bush's plan to overhaul
the Social Security retirement system; the botched response to
Hurricane Katrina; and the withdrawal of White House Counsel
Harriet Miers's nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court. More
recently, the White House has seen the conviction of former top
vice presidential aide Lewis Libby and a scandal over substandard
treatment of wounded military veterans at Washington's Walter
Reed Army Medical Center.
The firestorm over the U.S. attorneys spotlights Bush's
reliance on Texas advisers. E-mails show Miers, who has left the
government, was involved in the ousters; congressional Democrats
are threatening to subpoena Rove over his role; and Gonzales is
fighting calls for his resignation.
Some former top Bush aides say the president has sent
signals that he tunes out of much of the daily ebb and flow of
governing.
In ``The Price of Loyalty: George W. Bush, the White House
and the Education of Paul O'Neill,'' the former Treasury
secretary described an hour-long meeting with the president on
economic policy during which ``the president said nothing.''
Uncurious
That caused O'Neill, who was forced out in December 2002, to
wonder ``if the president didn't know the questions to ask, or
did he know and just not want to know the answers?''
John Dilulio, the former director of Bush's office of faith-
based initiatives, is also quoted in the book as saying that
during his eight months at the White House he heard ``not three
meaningful, substantive policy discussions'' on what Bush touted
as a major priority.
Others describe White House meetings and events as highly
scripted, with pre-determined outcomes.
During the spring 2004 scandal over U.S. mistreatment of
prisoners at Iraq's Abu Ghraib prison, Bush was kept in the dark
until photographs of abused Iraqis appeared in the New Yorker
magazine. The president later chastised then-Defense Secretary
Donald Rumsfeld for failing to give him early warning.
`Sweeping'
Even as Texas governor, Bush was ``sweeping in his acts of
delegation,'' said Fred I. Greenstein, a professor of politics at
Princeton University, in New Jersey.
Bush halved the time, to 15 minutes, for reviewing death
penalty cases. When a report was issued on a 1999 accident that
killed 12 Texas A&M students, Bush ``read neither the report nor
its executive summary, leaving it to his aides'' to summarize the
conclusions, Greenstein wrote in a study.
The consequences of a hands-off style are no academic
matter, Greenstein said. ``The danger is somebody who doesn't
explore issues in depth, and relies on subordinates, may end up
with a misguided mission.''
Bush can be direct about his desire to be left alone. Even
when biking with acquaintances, he asks them to lag behind -- so
he can enjoy at least the illusion of solitude.
An Uninterrupted Ride
No aides interrupted Bush as he was riding at a suburban
Maryland wildlife center on May 11, 2005, when a small plane
triggered a terror alert by straying into a no-fly zone near the
White House, forcing its evacuation.
While current top White House aides including Bolten
declined interview requests, Andrew Card, Bolten's predecessor as
chief of staff, says Bush is neither isolated nor disengaged.
``People need to respect that only the toughest of decisions
are made in the Oval Office,'' he said in an interview. ``He
rightly trusts others to make the other decisions, so he can
focus on presidential decisions.''
Earlier in his term, Bush's penchant for reserving his
energy for top-tier decisions and pushing the rest down to his
aides led many to consider him a refreshing change from President
Bill Clinton, who was often involved in the minutiae of
government.
A December 12, 2002, USA Today article about Bush was
headlined ``MBA president's success leaves Dems out in the
cold,'' and hailed Bush's focus on the big picture.
Misfortunes
Today, after watching the course of the Iraq war and the
chain of misfortunes that have befallen the 60-year-old
president, many political experts say it's this style that is
causing problems for Bush.
``The greatest hazard in the job of president is being
isolated, because you are operating behind a barrier of staff,
aides, and Secret Service,'' said Leon Panetta, a former staff
chief for Clinton.
``The only way to stay in touch with reality is through
your chief of staff -- but also through your own desire to know
what the hell is going on,'' Panetta said.
Ken Duberstein, President Ronald Reagan's former chief of
staff, said that ``you have to have people in the White House who
respect not only the president but the presidency and are willing
to be reality therapists.''
Some say Bush's detached style has created a vacuum at the
White House that vests too much authority in the hands of a few
trusted aides.
Bush ``is light on the early-warning systems other
presidents have used to avoid being blind-sided,'' said Bruce
Buchanan, a political scientist at the University of Texas in
Austin. ``This is why he has been slow to grasp and contain the
damage.''
To contact the reporter on this story:
Ed Chen in Washington at
echen32@bloomberg.net
Last Updated: March 19, 2007 00:26 EDT