Americans Wary of Action on Iran, Gloomy on Iraq, Poll Shows
By Janine Zacharia
April 13 (Bloomberg) -- American pessimism about the Iraq
war has deepened and may be feeding doubts about President George
W. Bush's efforts to thwart Iran's nuclear ambitions, the latest
Bloomberg/Los Angeles Times poll found.
A majority of those surveyed -- 56 percent -- said Iraq is
now in a civil war, and just 37 percent said they believe Bush
when he says a lot of progress is being made there, down from 45
percent who said they believed him in January.
Forty-eight percent said they would support military action
against Iran if it continues to produce material that can be used
to develop a nuclear bomb, down from 57 percent in January. Forty
percent oppose military action, up from 33 percent in January.
A majority -- 54 percent -- said they ``don't trust'' Bush
to make the right decision about whether the U.S. should go to
war with Iran, compared with 42 percent who said they do trust
him. Forty percent said the Iraq experience had made them less
supportive of military action against Iran, while 38 percent said
it had no impact. The poll surveyed 1,357 American adults by
telephone April 8-11 and had a margin of error of plus or minus 3
percentage points.
Analysts said negative perceptions of the war in Iraq are
driving sentiment on Iran. ``The Iraq experience is very
sobering; it tells people that the military solution that looks
so easy can be an illusion,'' said Joseph Cirincione, director
for nonproliferation at the Carnegie Endowment for International
Peace in Washington.
``I expect those numbers to go down,'' Cirincione said of
the support for an Iran strike. ``The more war with Iran is
discussed, the lower the numbers will be.''
Iran Views Influenced
Michael O'Hanlon, an analyst at the Brookings Institution in
Washington who has studied U.S. strategy in Iraq, said Americans'
disillusionment with Bush's handling of the war has influenced
their thinking on Iran.
``Three or four years ago, the American public might have
had such overwhelming confidence in the U.S. military and the
Bush administration that it would have essentially taken their
word that they could execute a strike effectively, and that it
would be worth the overall cost,'' O'Hanlon said.
``While the military remains well-regarded, we are also more
painfully aware of the limits of its capabilities in certain
situations,'' he said.
The prospect of a military strike on Iran jumped into the
headlines after an April 8 article in the New Yorker magazine
reported the U.S. is weighing air attacks on suspected weapons
facilities in that country.
Bush dismissed the story as ``wild speculation.'' Several
experts on the region say U.S. strikes couldn't be certain of
complete success -- and might send oil prices soaring while
sparking widespread terrorist retaliation or an Iranian
counterstrike on Israel.
Iranian Response
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Monday that Iran
was in the ``nuclear club'' and would accelerate uranium
enrichment to reach ``industrial scale-production.'' He rejected
a United Nations Security Council demand for suspension of the
program by the end of the month.
Iran insists its nuclear program is purely to generate
electricity, while the U.S. says it is aimed at making a bomb.
Iran used 164 centrifuges to produce enriched uranium, Iranian
officials said earlier this week. Yesterday, the country's deputy
nuclear chief, Mohammad Saeedi, said Iran will install 3,000
centrifuges this year as part of a plan to eventually expand the
program to 54,000 such devices.
It takes about 1,000 centrifuges working non-stop for a year
to enrich enough uranium for a single bomb, according to the UN's
nuclear watchdog agency, the International Atomic Energy Agency.
``While some believe that Iran's claims are credible, others
speculated that Iran made the announcement to send a message that
military strikes or sanctions would not deter Iran from achieving
a full nuclear cycle,'' said Anthony Cordesman, a specialist on
military affairs and the Middle East at the Washington-based
Center for Strategic and International Studies.
Doubts About Centrifuges
Cordesman said ``the Iranian claims also said nothing about
how efficient the claimed use of a small 164-centrifuge chain
was, what its life cycle and reliability was, and about the
ability to engineer a system that could approach weapons-grade
material.''
Crude oil climbed on Monday to the highest level since
shortly after Hurricane Katrina last year on concern supplies
from Iran could be disrupted by a confrontation over the
country's nuclear program.
U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said yesterday that
the Iranian announcement on uranium enrichment ``is going to
further isolate Iran'' and urged the Security Council to take
action.
Disillusionment on Iraq
While U.S. policy makers grapple with the Iranian nuclear
problem, they also face an intensifying insurgency in Iraq aimed
at destabilizing the government and driving out foreign forces.
As many as 38,164 Iraqi civilians have been killed since the
U.S. invasion in March 2003, Iraqbodycount.net, a research group
based in the U.K., said on its Web site yesterday. The daily rate
of civilian deaths increased to 36 in the third year of the
occupation from 20 in the first, the group said in a press
released on March 9.
As of Monday, there have been 2,360 U.S. military deaths,
including Defense Department civilian contractors, since the
invasion began, according to a Pentagon tally.
The Bloomberg/Los Angeles Times poll found mounting
skepticism about the Iraqi conflict, with 38 percent of Americans
saying it was worth fighting compared to 58 percent who said it
was not. Seventy-four percent said the situation would worsen or
remain the same over the next year while 23 percent thought it
would improve.
Americans are split on establishing a deadline for pulling
out of Iraq, with 45 percent saying Bush should set a date for
withdrawal of all U.S. troops while he is still in office while
49 percent said he should not, a statistically insignificant
difference.
Thirty-six percent of respondents said they believed Iraq
likely could maintain a democratic government after the U.S. and
its allies left, while 52 percent said it was unlikely they'd be
able to do so.
To contact the reporter on this story:
Janine Zacharia in Washington at
jzacharia@bloomberg.net
.
Last Updated: April 12, 2006 21:02 EDT