Greenspan's Miscues Haunt Bernanke as Fed Weighs Cut (Update1)
By Rich Miller
Sept. 17 (Bloomberg) -- Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S.
Bernanke is grappling with what predecessor Alan Greenspan might
call a conundrum.
At issue is whether today's U.S. economy most resembles
1998, when Greenspan may have been too eager to cut interest
rates, or 2000-2001, when he may have been too slow. The trouble
is, the situation now resembles a bit of both.
That increases the danger as the Fed's Open Market
Committee meets tomorrow to decide on interest-rate policy. If
Bernanke and his colleagues aim to avoid the mistake of 1998 and
opt for caution, they risk a recession. If they push ahead with
big rate cuts and growth proves resilient, they could find
themselves with rising inflation, fueled by record oil prices
and a slumping dollar.
``This is a critical time for the Fed,'' says Peter Hooper,
who worked at the central bank during the financial crisis in
1998 and is now chief U.S. economist for Deutsche Bank
Securities in New York. ``The stakes have risen.''
The Fed today faces a financial-market-driven increase in
borrowing costs, as in 1998, and a weakening economy comparable
to 2000. The central bank responded to the former with three
rapid-fire rate cuts, which some officials now think helped
inflate the stock-market bubble. In 2000, it made the opposite
mistake after the bubble burst, waiting too long to cut rates
and allowing the U.S. to fall into recession.
Template for Action
Which model the Fed latches onto will help determine
whether it reduces the federal funds rate tomorrow by a quarter
or a half percentage point. If 1998 is the guide, policy makers
may settle for the smaller cut. Taking a cue from the 2000
episode would suggest a half-point drop in the rate, which is
charged on overnight loans between banks.
Judging by their public comments, policy makers are divided
over which path to follow. Futures trading indicates investors
expect at least a quarter-point cut.
For J. Alfred Broaddus Jr., who helped fashion policy in
both 1998 and 2000 as Richmond Fed president, today's situation
``is more comparable to 2000 and 2001. There is a clear risk to
the economy.''
Gross domestic product grew at an average annual rate of
2.3 percent in 2007's first half, and economists surveyed by
Bloomberg expect that pace to continue through the end of the
year. In 1998, the economy expanded 4.2 percent.
`A Little Slow'
Broaddus says the Fed underestimated the economic impact of
the stock market slide that began in March of 2000 and
eventually dragged the Standard & Poor's 500 index down more
than 25 percent. ``We were a little slow to get under way'' with
rate reductions, he says.
This time, Fed officials have been surprised by the
severity of the housing decline and the damage it has wreaked on
the rest of the economy. Minutes of the FOMC's Aug. 7 meeting
show policy makers judged that the housing slump ``could well
prove to be both deeper and more prolonged than had seemed
likely earlier this year.''
Having left rates unchanged at that meeting, the Fed
changed course 10 days later, lowering the discount rate --what
it charges on direct loans to banks -- and acknowledging that
risks to the economy had risen ``appreciably.'' The surprise
move led investors to increase bets on a cut in the more-
important fed funds rate at tomorrow's meeting.
Greenspan's Endorsement
Greenspan endorses his successor's handling of the market
turmoil so far, saying in an interview with CBS television that
he is ``not certain I would have done anything different.''
Even so, the Fed ``has been very slow to acknowledge what
is one of the biggest busts in U.S. housing history,'' says
Allen Sinai, president of New York-based Decision Economics Inc.
What eventually helped push the Fed to cut rates at the
start of 2001 was a sharp drop in consumer confidence, recalls
Tom Simpson, a former senior official at the bank. As measured
by an index compiled by the University of Michigan, confidence
fell to a two-year low in December 2000.
Confidence is also depressed this year, reaching its lowest
level in a year in August and remaining close to that point in
early September.
Fed officials say they are well aware of the dangers that a
sudden drop in confidence could pose if it led to a pullback in
household and business spending.
`Important' Risk
``I believe it poses an important downside risk,'' Fed
Governor Frederic Mishkin said in a Sept. 10 speech in New York.
Simpson, who retired from the Fed in 2006 after 30 years
and is now at the University of North Carolina at Wilmington,
sees another parallel with 2000: Monetary policy is restricting
the economy after credit tightening by the central bank.
The Fed raised its target for the federal funds rate to 6.5
percent in May of 2000 from 4.75 percent in June of 1999. The
rate now stands at 5.25 percent, up from 1 percent in mid-2004.
Deutsche Bank's Hooper sees a danger of recession if the
Fed is too cautious in cutting rates.
In remembering the lessons of 2000 too well, though, the
central bank would risk losing ground in its fight to keep
inflation contained.
``Rate cuts are not free,'' says Marvin Goodfriend, senior
vice president at the Richmond Fed from 1993 to 2005 and now a
professor at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh. ``You pay
a price.''
Consider TIPS
The inflation risk makes it a good time for investors to
consider Treasury Inflation Protected Securities, says James
Evans, who manages $4 billion of inflation-linked bonds at Brown
Brothers Harriman & Co. in New York. ``The TIPS market is poised
to do pretty well,'' he says.
Laurence Meyer, a Fed governor from 1996 to 2002, cautions
against giving too much weight to comparisons with 2000. He
remembers hearing plenty of anecdotes back then about a slowing
economy. Today, the weakness appears more narrowly focused on
housing.
A regional Fed survey released Sept. 5 found the economic
effects of the August credit market rout ``limited'' outside of
housing.
``Our economy appears to be weathering the storm thus
far,'' Dallas Fed President Richard Fisher said in a Sept. 10
speech in Laredo, Texas. ``As yet, tighter credit conditions do
not appear to have had a major impact on overall economic
activity outside of real estate.''
Greenspan acknowledges that the Fed risked fanning
inflation when it lowered interest rates in 1998. Yet he argues
in his just-released book, ``The Age of Turbulence,'' that the
chance was worth taking to keep the crisis from dragging down
the economy.
Others who were policy makers at the time are not so sure.
Meyer, now vice chairman at Macroeconomic Advisors LLC in
Washington, says the lesson of that year is that ``it's very
hard to judge the linkages between the financial markets and the
economy,'' he says. ``You can over-react.''
To contact the reporter on this story:
Rich Miller in Washington
rmiller28@bloomberg.net
Last Updated: September 16, 2007 19:32 EDT