Obama’s First Civility Test Is Pelosi’s Manners: Kevin Hassett
Commentary by Kevin Hassett
Jan. 26 (Bloomberg) -- President Barack Obama’s electoral
success has much to do with his grasp of the American mood.
Democratic and Republican Americans coexist peacefully every day
and are unanimously disgusted by the increasingly negative tone
of our politics.
Obama revealed last January that he shared those feelings
of disgust, in his masterful acceptance speech after the Iowa
caucuses: “You said the time has come to move beyond the
bitterness and pettiness and anger that’s consumed Washington;
to end the political strategy that’s been all about division and
instead make it about addition -- to build a coalition for
change that stretches through Red States and Blue States.”
It is noteworthy and accurate that bitterness and anger
consume Washington. The virtue of Americans is not in question;
the virtue of politicians is.
A similar theme was the high point of Obama’s inaugural
address: “On this day, we come to proclaim an end to the petty
grievances and false promises, the recriminations and worn-out
dogmas that for far too long have strangled our politics.”
While higher virtue is in itself a worthy goal, it has a
practical reward as well. It is no coincidence that the tone of
our government has degenerated at the same time as its
performance. One could randomly select any corner of government
today and find ample room for improvement, to say the least.
There is nowhere an individual foolish enough, or an addict
delirious enough, to design a government that works the way ours
does.
Partisan Folly
There has been far too little wisdom in Washington. Obama
recognizes the link between partisanship and folly.
This view is hardly new to world philosophy, foreshadowed
as it was long ago by Aristotle, who wrote that “it is
impossible to be practically wise without being good.” He added
that “virtue makes us aim at the right end, and practical
wisdom makes us take the right means.”
If there is a new spirit of hopefulness in this country, in
spite of the terrible state of our national affairs, it may well
have been kindled by Obama’s call to virtue. But such calls have
been made before. George W. Bush himself became president
because he had reached the same epiphany as Obama.
In his first inaugural address, in 2001, Bush restated a
case that he had made throughout the election. “Some seem to
believe that our politics can afford to be petty because, in a
time of peace, the stakes of our debates appear small,” he
said.
He went on, “Civility is not a tactic or a sentiment. It
is the determined choice of trust over cynicism, of community
over chaos. And this commitment, if we keep it, is a way to
shared accomplishment.”
Bush’s Admission
When listing the failures of his presidency at a recent
talk, Bush cited first his failure to restore civility. To
succeed where Bush failed, Obama must recognize two truths.
First, civility begins at the beginning. In the next month,
Obama will set a tone for Washington that will likely endure as
long as he does. If he fails to live up to his rhetoric now, he
will fail just as Bush did.
Second, civility begins at home. It is one thing to demand
civility of one’s opponents, another thing altogether to demand
it of one’s own party.
Obama faced an early test last week, when, in the midst of
the debate over economic stimulus, Democrats worked to shut
Republicans out of the policy process, then behaved boorishly
when Republicans complained.
Democratic leaders responded with the political equivalent
of a sack dance in football. “If it’s passed with 63 votes or
73 votes, history won’t remember it,” said Senator Richard
Durbin, Democrat of Illinois.
Yes We Did
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi added to the mood by saying,
“Yes, we wrote the bill. Yes, we won the election.”
There is still time for Obama to object to such behavior.
If he wants to fulfill the promise of his rhetoric, he should
take Pelosi to the woodshed and insist that she include
Republicans, collegially, in the process. He should stand up to
his party and threaten to veto a bill if it fails to make
reasonable concessions to his friends across the aisle. He
should advise his own staff to begin returning the phone calls
of senior Republican aides.
If he fails to do that, there can be little doubt that
government will fail to change and will continue to fail us.
When times are good, one might be able to survive with a pitiful
government. Today, we might not be so lucky. We are living in a
fleeting moment where real change is possible. Aristotle is
watching.
(Kevin Hassett, director of economic-policy studies at the
American Enterprise Institute, is a Bloomberg News columnist. He
was an adviser to Republican Senator John McCain of Arizona in
the 2008 presidential election. The opinions expressed are his
own.)
To contact the writer of this column:
Kevin Hassett at
khassett@aei.org
Last Updated: January 26, 2009 00:01 EST