Stanford Finance Chief Davis Meets With FBI, SEC, Says Lawyer
By Laurel Brubaker Calkins, Erik Larson and Alison Fitzgerald
March 26 (Bloomberg) -- James M. Davis, accused of helping
R. Allen Stanford swindle investors in an alleged $8 billion
Ponzi scheme, met yesterday with investigators, his lawyer said.
Davis, 60, the chief financial officer for the Stanford
Financial Group of companies, met with representatives of the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Bureau
of Investigation at the SEC’s Fort Worth, Texas, offices, his
lawyer, David Finn, said in a phone interview. Last month, Davis
filed court papers asserting his right against self-
incrimination and refusing to cooperate with the SEC.
Regulators last month sued Stanford, Davis, Stanford Chief
Investment Officer Laura Pendergest-Holt and three related
companies, alleging they orchestrated a “massive ongoing
fraud” through the sale of high-yield certificates of deposit
by Antigua-based Stanford International Bank Ltd.
“Jim is fully and actively cooperating, and trying to get
investors who lost their money some help,” said Finn, a former
federal prosecutor and Texas judge. “He’s absolutely
devastated, because he knows a lot of good people got hurt.”
Finn wouldn’t comment on when or how Davis plans to answer
the SEC’s allegations that he and Stanford controlled the
alleged scheme, in which early investors were repaid with funds
taken from later investors. Davis was “actually the
whistleblower” who alerted regulators to the fraud after
Stanford’s senior executives met in Miami in early February to
prepare for SEC questioning, Finn said.
Whistleblower
“After that infamous Miami meeting, he was the one who
blew the whistle and brought the house of cards down,” Finn
said.
As part of his effort to locate and recover Stanford
assets, Ralph Janvey, a court-appointed receiver, asked a judge
to force the law firm Hunton & Williams LLP to turn over all
records of its work for Stanford International Bank, according
to papers filed March 24 in federal court in Dallas.
The Richmond, Virginia-based law firm rejected a Feb. 24
request to ship the receiver original files and billing records
for Stanford’s foreign businesses, including the Antigua-based
bank and operations in Ecuador, Panama and Grenada, according to
Janvey.
“The Hunton & Williams law firm has declined to relinquish
possession and control of records that are part of the
receivership estate,” Janvey said in the filing. “Information
regarding valuable assets belonging to the bank and other
offshore Stanford entities may be found in the files.”
The law firm and one of its Miami-based lawyers, Carlos
Loumiet, questioned Janvey’s jurisdiction over Houston-based
Stanford’s foreign records. Janvey, appointed to recover assets
to repay victims, said Hunton & Williams is providing only the
requested documents for Stanford’s U.S. businesses.
Law Firm Response
In an e-mail yesterday, Hunton & Williams spokeswoman Kim
Perret said the law firm is cooperating with Janvey and will
seek a court ruling on the dispute.
“There are legal issues regarding jurisdiction and client
privilege that must be resolved before we proceed further,”
Perret said. “We have agreed with the receiver’s counsel to ask
the court to rule on these issues, a process that will protect
all parties involved.”
Stanford and Davis haven’t been criminally charged in
connection with the alleged scheme. Pendergest-Holt was charged
with obstructing the investigation and released on $300,000
bond. Her lawyer, Dan Cogdell, said she is innocent and was
cooperating with investigators until her Feb. 25 arrest.
Legal-Fees Lawsuit
Pendergest-Holt has sued Lloyd’s of London for legal-
defense funds under Stanford’s officers and directors insurance
policy. A federal judge in Dallas froze the personal assets of
Stanford, Davis and Pendergest-Holt when they were sued by the
SEC. Finn said Davis is paying his legal fees with funds
provided by Davis’s “family, friends and others in time of need
who come to try to assist someone they really care for.”
“I can tell you the funds are absolutely, positively not
derived from anything associated with this case,” Finn said of
his legal fees. “So, any investor who is concerned that I’m
being paid with dirty money, that’s not happening.”
Finn said he couldn’t explain why Davis invoked his Fifth
Amendment right against self-incrimination under the U.S.
Constitution on Feb. 21 and later abandoned it. Finn said he
didn’t represent Davis until last week.
Stanford filed papers last month refusing to testify and
asserting his right against self-incrimination. He hasn’t named
a defense lawyer.
$250 million Recovered
Paul Pelletier, a principal trial attorney for the U.S.
Justice Department, told a U.S. magistrate last month that
investigators and Janvey have been able to locate about
$250 million of the $8 billion in assets the Stanford entities
publicly claimed. Allen Stanford is accused of skimming as much
as $1.6 billion in personal loans from the companies, of which
he was the sole shareholder.
Kevin Callahan, and SEC spokesman, Justice Department
spokesman Ian McCaleb and FBI spokeswoman Shauna Dunlap declined
to comment.
The case is SEC v. Stanford International Bank Ltd.,
09-cv- 00298-N, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas
(Dallas).
To contact the reporters on this story:
Laurel Brubaker Calkins in Houston at
laurel@calkins.us.com
;
Erik Larson in New York
at
elarson4@bloomberg.net
;
Alison Fitzgerald in Houston at
afitzgerald2@bloomberg.net
.
Last Updated: March 26, 2009 00:01 EDT