Banks May Have to Compete for Student Loan Subsidies (Update2)
By Paul Basken
Feb. 15 (Bloomberg) -- Banks that provide college loans with
U.S. subsidies would have to compete for the payments, possibly
saving the federal government as much as $7 billion a year, under
legislation being drafted by Senator Edward Kennedy.
Kennedy, a Massachusetts Democrat and chairman of the Senate
Education Committee, plans to file the measure this week,
spokeswoman Melissa Wagoner said. One ``rough'' estimate projects
savings of $4 billion to $7 billion a year over the current
system, in which Congress sets the reimbursement for handling the
loans, Wagoner said.
The legislation is the latest proposal to cut the profits
that lenders such as SLM Corp., known as Sallie Mae, reap from
government-subsidized student loans. Banks make about $18 billion
by helping the government supply about $90 billion a year in
tuition financing, federal education officials have said.
``Clumsy government price controls can have unintended
consequences,'' said Thomas Kane, a professor at Harvard
University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, who is studying the
system for the nonprofit Brookings Institution. ``Any of the
market-based approaches are likely to generate savings for
federal taxpayers and for students over the current program.''
Banks that handle the subsidized student loans are opposing
a bidding system.
Quality of Service
``The auction concept was considered and rejected in a
previous Congress, because it is not student-friendly and most
likely will result in higher-cost loans and poorer quality
service for students,'' said John Dean, special counsel to the
Consumer Bankers Association in Washington. The group represents
lenders including Citigroup Inc., Bank of America Corp. and Wells
Fargo & Co.
Shares of Charlotte, North Carolina-based Bank of America
slipped 20 cents to $53.85 at 4:02 p.m. in New York Stock
Exchange composite trading. New York-based Citigroup gained 3
cents to $54.21, while its subsidiary, Stamford, Connecticut-
based Student Loan Corp., rose $7.41, or 4 percent, to $192.
Shares of San Francisco-based Wells Fargo were unchanged at
$36.01.
Forcing lenders to compete for the subsidies also might
create inequities among the schools if banks focus their bidding
on the portfolio of a school such as Harvard while ignoring less-
wealthy schools, Sallie Mae spokesman Tom Joyce said. Shares of
Reston, Virginia-based Sallie Mae rose 39 cents to $43.
Affordability
The Bush administration has said the current system for
government-backed loans leaves too many students unable to afford
college. President George W. Bush this month proposed deepening
cuts in federal payments to lenders for student loans in fiscal
2008. The savings would be used to help fund his proposed
increase in Pell Grants, the main government grant program for
low-income college students.
Education officials said they didn't have a position on
Kennedy's proposal.
``The administration is in favor of efforts to increase
access, affordability,'' said Katherine McLane, spokeswoman for
U.S. Education Secretary Margaret Spellings. ``But until there's
something to look at, we wouldn't be able to say one way or the
other.''
`Industry-Transforming'
The idea would be ``totally industry-transforming,'' analyst
Charles Gabriel of Prudential Equity Group Inc. said in a Feb. 7
conference call with investors.
``Sallie Mae and other large lenders might be expected to
survive, if not dominate, such a regime,'' Gabriel said. ``But
the uncertainty accompanying any serious debate of it would be
potentially roiling.''
The banking industry should consider negotiating the terms
of such an arrangement now, rather than risk having it imposed
after 2008, when Democrats might control Congress and the White
House, Gabriel said.
The idea didn't have enough political support previously, in
part because the government was running budget surpluses, said
Michael Dannenberg, a former Kennedy aide who is now director of
education policy at the New America Foundation, a nonpartisan
public policy group based in Washington.
That's changed because of ``a confluence of circumstances,''
including the growth of federal budget deficits, the Democratic
takeover of Congress and Bush's own willingness to challenge
lender subsidies, Dannenberg said.
To contact the reporter on this story:
Paul Basken in Washington at
pbasken@bloomberg.net
Last Updated: February 15, 2007 16:17 EST