HIV Vaccine Success May Take Decade to Unravel Why It Works
Sept. 28 (Bloomberg) -- The surprise finding that a
combination of two experimental vaccines reduced HIV infections
is confounding long-held assumptions about the AIDS virus and
sending scientists back to the laboratory to address mysteries
that may take a decade to solve.
A study of 16,000 volunteers in Thailand, reported last
week, found those getting the immunization had a 31 percent
lower infection rate than those given a placebo, the first time
any vaccine had positive results. The report startled
scientists, many of whom had dismissed the trial as a dead end,
said Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of
Allergy and Infectious Disease in Bethesda, Maryland.
The injection must be at least 50 percent effective before
widespread immunization is feasible, said Josh Ruxin, director
of the Access Project program in Rwanda. Researchers led by
Fauci say they can’t improve the vaccine until they understand
how it blocked infections, or why it failed to show any benefit
for people who still got infected with HIV.
“Some of our preconceived notions about what to measure
and what we think is important might have just been turned on
its head,” said Colonel Nelson L. Michael, director of the
division of retrovirology at the Walter Reed military hospital
in Washington, in a news conference. The U.S. military helped
conduct the trial.
HIV infects about 7,400 new people every day worldwide, and
led to 2 million deaths in 2007 according to UNAIDS. While there
are treatments that can suppress the virus for those who can
afford them, there is no cure. Even after the success of the
vaccine study, a much-needed vaccine may yet be 10 years away,
according to the Access Project’s Ruxin and Jeffrey Kraws, chief
executive officer of Crystal Research Associates in New York.
Two Vaccines
The Thai study combined two vaccines, neither proven. One
was ALVAC, developed by Sanofi-Aventis SA in Paris. The other
was AIDSVAX, created by a Genentech Inc. spinoff, VaxGen Inc.
AIDSVAX was later licensed to Global Solutions for Infectious
Diseases, a nonprofit group led by Donald Francis, who left
VaxGen in 2003 after initial trials failed.
AIDSVAX, which failed in previous tests, contains an HIV
protein called gp120 that’s designed to encourage the body to
produce neutralizing antibodies to recognize and destroy HIV
before it can infect healthy cells. ALVAC focuses on increasing
cellular responses to attack the virus. The theory behind the
combination was that ALVAC would “prime” the immune system to
respond, and AIDSVAX would “boost” the antibody response.
Measurable Signs
The unexpected success “tells us that we don’t even know
what the correlates of immunity are,” Fauci said, referring to
the measurable signs that a person has developed defenses
against a virus. “But it does give us now a bit more direction
for trying to track down what it is this vaccine did that led to
this modest degree of protection.”
Antibodies, protective proteins developed in the body in
response to a virus or vaccine, are the most common signal of
immunity. Researchers haven’t identified neutralizing antibodies
produced by the experimental vaccine, and previous quests to
induce such antibodies have ended in failure, Fauci said.
Scientists are also searching for signs of boosted cellular
defenses that might be key to the vaccine’s success.
“We’re not even close to being finished,” Fauci said.
Scientists also don’t understand why the combination
vaccine failed to show benefit for people who still got infected
with HIV. Other vaccines that aren’t 100 percent effective, such
as the seasonal flu shot, typically make symptoms less severe in
patients who still get sick.
Virus Levels
In the Thai trial, vaccinated patients who still contracted
HIV had the same levels of virus in their blood as patients who
never received the vaccine. That was perplexing, as researchers
assumed it would be easier to reduce the so-called viral load
than to prevent infection, said Mitchell Warren, executive
director of the AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition in New York.
Collaborators on the Thai study are continuing to track the
vaccinated patients who were infected in a study called RV152 to
see whether the virus levels diverge and whether symptoms are
lessened. There are limited supplies of the shots, though, and
it will take time to produce enough for more tests, said Donald
Francis, of Global Solutions for Infectious Diseases, at the
news conference announcing the finding last week.
“The samples and specimens collected from this trial have
become a precious resource,” Warren said in a telephone
interview. “Over the next few months we’ll see some consensus
as to what are the elements of trials that need to be conducted
with the current samples.”
No Natural Immunity
After people are infected with HIV, treatment with antiviral
drugs can keep HIV at bay for years, allowing patients to have
healthy and productive lives, said Michel Kazatchkine, executive
director of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and
Malaria. However, the virus can’t be driven from the body, so
patients can’t develop natural immunity for doctors to use as a
model for vaccine research.
“You start from nowhere,” Kazatchkine said in an
interview. “Is it one of the components? Is it the mixture? Is
it the way it was administered? We need to build more science,
more pilot trials, and then one day, another big trial.”
“You’re looking at 5, 10 years minimum to have commercial
viability here,” said Kraws, CEO of Crystal Research
Associates. “There was a reason why this failed for Sanofi-
Aventis the first time, and it is not because they are stupid.
We have to analyze it further and see how it works and make
adjustments.”
Retention Rate
The Thai study required six shots and 19 visits from
patients over the course of three years, said Warren, of the
AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition. Of those who received the
shots, 51 became infected with HIV, compared with 74 who
received a placebo. The results wouldn’t have carried
statistical weight without the study’s 90 percent retention of
patients, an unusually high rate that will be difficult to
replicate in future studies, Warren said.
“Since the early 1980s it has been an annual letdown, an
annual cause for collective depression that every year we seem
to be about 10 years away from an effective AIDS vaccine,” said
Ruxin, whose Access Project helps Rwandan health facilities
deliver care for people with AIDS.
“The next 10 years feel better than the last, but it still
feels like it will be 10 years,” Ruxin said in a telephone
interview from Kigali, Rwanda.
To contact the reporter on this story:
Tom Randall in New York at
trandall6@bloomberg.net.
Last Updated: September 28, 2009 00:00 EDT